Thursday, July 7, 2011

Gizmo to rumble bombers

AN amazing sensor that can scan huge crowds and pick out a lone suicide bomber by homing in on hidden explosives has undergone official tests, The Sun can reveal.

The revolutionary gizmo - similar to airport scanners but top secret - is believed to silently analyse materials using the unique "terahertz" waves emitted by different substances.

Government scientists began testing it a year ago on mock crowds where one person in every 75 carried a "Person-Borne Improvised Explosive Device" - boffin-speak for a suicide bomb. 

Heavily-censored reports obtained by The Sun in a freedom of information request reveal other trials saw the human guinea pigs armed with "handguns and knives".

Real terrorists would have no idea they had been scanned from a distance - and could be intercepted before causing mayhem.

The futuristic device - officially known as a "stand-off imaging system" - could be used to protect plum al-Qaeda targets such as rail stations, shopping centres and sporting events.

Home Office sources have not ruled out the system being in place at the London Olympics.

Details remain hush-hush but it is thought to be sophisticated enough to differentiate between plastic explosive and plasticine. A Whitehall source said: "If this technology had been available years ago, who knows what tragedies might have been averted?"



The tests have been conducted at the Home Office's Centre for Applied Science and Technology (CAST).

It has two secretive labs, one in Hertfordshire and the other in West Sussex. A source said: "It's just like Q's lair in the James Bond films.

"You half expect to see 007's Aston Martin. But the work that goes on there is vital."

The Home Office said: "Protecting the public is our No1 priority. We regularly test new technologies to help us face the ongoing terrorist threat."

Iran threatens 'serious action' over BBC plans to screen documentary series on Muhammad

Three-part series The Life of Muhammad has already been blasted by officials in Iran, who claim the country will take 'serious action' if it is screened.

The Iranian minister of cultural and Islamic guidance, Mohammad Hosseini, who has yet to watch any of the series, has branded the film an attempt by the 'enemy' to 'ruin Muslims' sanctity'.

'The BBC's decision to make a documentary on the life of [the] prophet Muhammad seems dubious and if our suspicions are proved to be correct, we will certainly take serious action,' he told Iran's Fars news agency.

The documentary, to be broadcast in mid-July, just ahead of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan in August, will see journalist and TV presenter Rageh Omaar travel to the place of Muhammad's birth, Mecca, to re-trace the footsteps of the prophet.

However, the series will feature no visual images of Muhammad in a bid not to offend Muslims, whose religion forbids depiction of the prophet.

Instead, a spoken description of Muhammad will be given, making this the first biographical documentary not to feature visual images of the subject.

The documentary-makers claims the film will raise questions about Islam's role in the world today and explore 'where Islam's attitudes towards money, charity, women, social equality, religious tolerance, war and conflict originate'.

Mr Omaar, the Middle Eastern correspondent for Al Jazeera English, said: 'I am extremely pleased to be presenting this exciting and groundbreaking series.

'The details of Muhammad's life really are little known, and I hope that my series will – for many – shine a light on the very beginning of Islam, taking viewers to the heart of this faith, illustrating just how Muhammad's life and legacy is as important today as it was a over a thousand years ago.'

The show was commissioned by the BBC's first Muslim head of Religion & Ethics, Aaqil Ahmed.

I saved my 13-year-old from Asian gang

A MUM has revealed how she saved her pretty teenage daughter from a life of drugs, prostitution and possible death after she was groomed by a gang of perverted Asian men.

Read more:

first I want to note the irritating, obfuscating and bordering on pathological use of the term "Asian" - by British newspapers in lieu of the more accurate muslim.Honest journalism has succumbed to dhimmitude and political correctness. 
I wondered - Do muslims refer to themselves as "Asian"? So I thought I'd check a few muslim online publications to see what people they consider to be "Asian":Al Arabya News Channel - Gulf Daily News - The Voice of Bahrain - Kuwait Arab Times -Crime - The Muslim News
In reviewing the above searches you will find that the vast majority - if not 100% - use the word 'Asian' in regards to China, Japan, Malaysia, etc.
The same countries and people that we all think of when reading the word 'Asian'. So clearly muslims do not refer to themselves as 'Asian'.
Isn't it time that British newspapers stop treating their readers like a bunch of dopes?

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

PAT CONDELL

'Saudi diplomats among worst in London'

the number of foreign diplomats and embassy staff in London being arrested over crimes is on the rise, with 
Saudi Arabia's embassy topping the list, says a 
new report.

The Metropolitan Police provided fresh figures of the crimes
 including sex attacks and robberies, which were
released to the daily Evening Standards following a
Freedom of Information request.

The figures showed that 59 officially registered foreign diplomats
 have been held for crimes committed in the UK capital during the
 past three years, but managed to escape justice claiming to enjoy
 diplomatic immunity.

According to the figures, Saudi Arabia's mission has produced the
 highest number of offenders, with four of its embassy staff nabbed
for drink-drive charges and another for shoplifting.

But, the most serious case involved a man from Sierra Leon's
 High Commission, who was arrested for rape. Others detained
 by the Met included suspected robbers from the Nigerian and
 Ivory Coast embassies and sex attackers from Egypt and Bolivia.

Further offences committed during the diplomatic crimewave
included fraud, grievous bodily harm, drink-driving and shoplifting.

A suspect from Oman's embassy was arrested for making a
 bomb threat, according to figures.

Jerry Jones, a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority
 said she was appalled by the fact that serious offenders
were escaping justice.

"These are people who could go on to commit other offences
 and it is time that these antiquated laws were revised so
 that people who commit crimes can be prosecuted," she said.

The statistics showed that 27 diplomats or their relatives were
 arrested during the year to the end of March.

This is while that the previous year's total was 22,
 while the 2008/9 figure was 10. It means that the
number arrested has risen by 170 percent over the
three years.

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Dewsbury, Bradford and Tower Hamlets ... where Islamic extremists want to establish independent states with sharia law



Islamic extremists have called on British Muslims to establish three independent states within the UK.

The notorious Muslims Against the Crusades (MAC) group have named Yorkshire towns Bradford and Dewsbury and Tower Hamlets in East London as testbeds for blanket sharia rule.
The medieval 'emirates' would operate entirely outside British law, according to a document on the MAC website.

Veiled women pictured in the London borough of Tower Hamlets which has seen a rise in extremism
Veiled women in the London borough of Tower Hamlets which has seen a rise in
 extremism.
 The Muslims Against the Crusades group says the medieval 'emirates' would function as
autonomous
 territories and operate entirely outside British law, according to a document published
on their website
Where the group envisages the autonomous areas being set up
Where the group envisages the autonomous areas being set up

The MAC group, led by Abu Assadullah, was set up last year and has become notorious because of its violent protests, most provocatively burning poppies during the Remembrance Day silence.

Under the heading 'Muslims should set up Islamic emirates in the UK', MAC says: 'We suggest it is time that areas with large Muslim populations declare an emirate delineating that Muslims trying to live within this area are trying to live by the sharia as much as possible with their own courts and community watch and schools and even self sufficient trade.

    'Likely areas for these projects might be Dewsbury or Bradford or Tower Hamlets to begin with. 

    'In time we can envisage that the whole of the sharia might one day be implemented starting with these enclaves.' 
    The call is likely to cause anger among moderate Muslims and community leaders in the areas concerned.
    Ian Greenwood, leader of Bradford Council, said people would 'not allow extremists to provoke them into violence'.

    London 7/7 bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan lived in Dewsbury, which has battled to diffuse extremism in recent years.

    In 2007, it was alleged that a number of Muslims in Dewsbury were running an illegal Islamic court from a school and similar claims have been made in Tower Hamlets and Bradford. 

    Tower Hamlets council was last year accused of falling under the control of extremist groups following a documentary by the Daily Telegraph journalist Andrew Gilligan.

    The plan is part of the MAC's response to the government's revised Prevent strategy to combat Islamic extremism.

    In its document, called Islamic Prevent, the fanatics also call for an end to CCTV cameras in and around mosques. 

    It says: 'Muslims must get rid of all CCTV cameras from Muslim institutions. Sadly many mosques have today adopted CCTV cameras to spy on Muslims on behalf of the police and local authorities.' 

    Other inflammatory instructions include demanding the release of all Muslim prisoners, a ban on Muslims joining the police or armed forces and a rejection of British democracy.

    The document ends: 'We can conclude that measures by the UK government are nothing more than an attempt by them to strip the Muslim community of their Islamic identity and to integrate them into the non-Islamic way of life.' 

    The revised Prevent programme, announced last month, is aimed at tackling home-grown terrorism and radicalisation of students. 

    It demands stricter controls on extremist literature and a more proactive approach by universities to prevent extremism. 
    Councillor Greenwood added: 'Extremism is less likely to emerge when people get the opportunity to come together.

    'Local voluntary, community and faith groups, the council, and other public and private sector partners, all work together in Bradford to strengthen community relations and encourage better understanding and respect between all our communities.

    'We believe that this is one of the best ways to build a tolerant society in which extremism plays no part.'

    Tower Hamlets and Kirklees Council, the local authority for Dewsbury, refused to comment.

    Saturday, July 2, 2011

    Saddam Hussein's Torturer Finds Work in British Hospital...


    A doctor involved in horrific torture by Saddam Hussein’s henchmen is working in British hospitals.

    In an astonishing immigration scandal, border officials have allowed the suspected war criminal to treat thousands of British patients.

    Checks failed to uncover his history of working for the notorious Iraqi Intelligence Agency, which ran the country in a reign of terror during the Saddam years. 
    Dr Mohammed Kassim Al-Byati was given a permit to work as a doctor in the NHS by the Labour government in 2004.

    His job was to patch up torture victims so that they could be subjected to more appalling treatment.

    In 2007, Al-Byati contacted the Home Office to confess to his  horrific past so that he could  claim asylum. 

    But, incredibly, this did not prevent him from  carrying on earning tens of thousands of pounds working at a hospital in Wales. 

    Even now, despite his file being referred to a specialist war crimes unit, he remains cleared by the General Medical Council, and has been working in the West Midlands.
     
    The details have only now been unearthed by Home Secretary Theresa May, who was ‘horrified’ to discover what had been taking place.

    She has ordered an urgent inquiry, and is planning changes to the rules to stop any similar cases slipping through the net. 

    There will also be a shake-up of the UK Border Agency war crimes unit.
    Whitehall sources say the case shows the total shambles which UKBA became under Labour.

    At its heart lies the Human  Rights Act and a little-known EU directive which permitted the doctor to work even when his past  was known.


    It follows the controversy earlier this week of UKBA failing to stop a banned extremist, Raed Salah, from entering the country.

    Under Saddam Hussein’s brutal regime countless Iraqis were tortured, maimed and imprisoned.

    Favoured methods used by his secret police included eye-gouging; piercing of hands with an electric drill; suspension from a ceiling; electric shock; rape and other forms of sexual abuse; beating of the soles of feet; mock executions; extinguishing cigarettes on the body, and acid baths.

    A case history seen by the Mail shows that Al-Byati arrived in Britain on a six-month visitor visa in January 2000, nine years after the end of the first Gulf War which left Saddam in power. 

    Officials twice extended his leave to stay so he could undertake clinical attachments as a doctor.  

    In January 2004, by which time Iraq had been invaded again, a work permit was granted and he was employed at a hospital in Wolverhampton until February 2007. 

    At this point, Al-Byati claimed asylum. In his witness statement he says he worked for the Iraqi Intelligence Agency.

    In March 2007, while being interviewed by UKBA, Al-Byati stated that he patched people up after torture and was aware that the victims were returning to torture, but did not feel he could do anything about it. 

    A month later, his file was referred to the war crimes unit.

    In 2008, he applied for permission to work as he had the offer of a four-month contract with a hospital in Wales. 

    Normally, asylum seekers are barred from working. But there is an EU directive that allows an asylum seeker to work if the case has not been dealt with for 12 months or more through no fault of their own.

    As a result, since 2008 Al-Byati has been working full-time as a locum registrar and occasionally as a consultant in the West Midlands.

    The scandal was unearthed because UKBA has just given advice to its chief executive that Al-Byati should be granted leave to remain, or asylum.

    At this point, the stunned Home Secretary was made aware of what was happening. Leave to remain has not been granted.

    A senior source said: ‘The Home Secretary was horrified to find out that this has been allowed to carry on for so long. She dragged the acting chief executive into her office and he got the hairdryer treatment.’ 

    The source continued: ‘We always knew that Labour let the immigration system get out of control but we were genuinely stunned. The Home Secretary is seriously considering having a review of the way the entire agency works.’

    The Home Secretary has also been demanding answers from the GMC, which is supposed to check a doctor’s background, but has been frustrated by slow response. 

    One perversity of the asylum system is that the worse the crimes an applicant has been involved in, the more likely he is to be allowed to stay.

    He can claim that, if sent back to the country where the offences were committed, he may be subjected to degrading treatment, which is not allowed under the Human Rights Act.

    In the past some asylum seekers have made their past exploits sound worse to bolster their case. 

    A report last year branded Britain a ‘safe haven’ for war criminals with hundreds of people wanted for murder and torture living here free from prosecution.

    The GMC said last night: ‘We have recently become aware of concerns regarding this doctor.’

    By Fay Schlesinger

    ‘


    Mohammed Kassim Al-Byati last night told how he witnessed the horrifying injuries inflicted by Saddam Hussein’s henchmen – before patching up the victims and leaving them in the hands of their tormentors.

    Sitting in the living room of the detached four-bedroom house he shares with his wife and three children in a leafy suburb of Birmingham, the grossly overweight doctor launched into a staunch defence of his actions.

    With Wimbledon showing on the television screen beside him, he insisted: ‘What I have done was my normal doctor duty...which I am doing here (in Britain) every minute.’ 
    Mail
    Mail
    Since 2002, Al-Byati says he has worked at hospitals across the country, including Wolverhampton, Solihull, Blackpool, Manchester, Ipswich and Llandudno.

    Specialising in rheumatology, the senior registrar works as a locum and runs clinics for thousands of unsuspecting British patients, who had no idea of the role he played in Saddam’s brutal regime.

    In 1992, aged 27, he was party to the  Iraqi regime’s deadly treatment of prisoners in Baghdad.

    Al-Byati, now 46, worked for the country’s secret intelligence unit for 15 months after qualifying as a junior doctor. 
    It was part of the military service required by the regime, and Al-Byati claims he ‘had no choice’ over the matter. 

    The intelligence agency had a top-security prison in Kadhimiya, where Saddam was eventually executed in 2006.
    It was there that Al-Byati was taken when the vicious guards realised they had gone too far and risked having a death on their hands.

    Speaking to the Mail last night, the doctor at first tried to play down the extent of the prisoners’ injuries. He said: ‘There were some bruises, some cuts.’

    But on further probing, he admitted that three men he treated had been left ‘for one or two days’ without treatment after vicious beatings.

    'Not bleeding much because it was one day, two days before they called me. They looked like somebody who had a big accident.


    He said: ‘There were some bruises, some cut wounds, mostly on the arms. Not with a knife, probably with a wood thing. 
    ‘There are two men with you and the prisoner can’t even look at you. I can’t do more than dressing, only simple suturing. 
    'I said two people need to be transferred to hospital.

    ‘What’s going to happen after that? Are they going to torture them? I would say yes but I  haven’t seen with my own eyes. It’s just assumption.’ 

    Asked whether he thought the prisoners had survived, Al-Byati said: ‘They were alive when I left,’ and then laughed.
    The doctor said he would have been killed or his family harmed if he had tried to alert humanitarian groups. 

    He told no one, and continued working in Baghdad until 1995, before departing for Jordan and then Libya. 
    In 2000 he moved to the UK to complete British medical qualifications, and then worked in hospitals as a well-paid registrar.
    Everything was going swimmingly until 2007, he said, when his visa lapsed and the Home Office blocked his application for a replacement.

    So Al-Byati decided to apply for asylum, on the grounds that the lives of his wife Yousra and children, now aged seven, 12 and 17, will be at risk if they are forced to return to Iraq. 

    From 2007, Al-Byati could not work for a year, he said, but was able to claim benefits and a council house. He then applied for a work permit and it was granted. 

    He said: ‘The money as a locum is very good. I have not worked for the past three months but I have saved.’ 

    But Al-Byati said life now is ‘very difficult’. He said: ‘I can’t go out of this country. I want to see my 70-year-old mother and my brother in America. My wife has family in Jordan, she wants to go there. But we have no passport. It’s like my wife and children are in prison.

    ‘I can’t get a job, I can’t progress. To be honest, I’m very upset.’ Al-Byati said he does not consider himself to be a war criminal or to have colluded in the atrocities. 

    Neither does he regret the 15 months he worked for the secret service.

    His message to the Home Office is unequivocal: ‘If you think I’m a collaborator, reject me. I’ve been in this country for 11 years. If anything was wrong they would refuse my application at the first time.

    ‘I’ve done my job as a doctor, nothing more. So if you think that treating people who were tortured was a crime, it’s up to you. For me, I was the one who was helping them.’